This is amazing, and worth thinking about in almost any line of work.

lareviewofbooks:


Today The Dial is in the hands of novelist Glen David Gold, who explores the prickliness of literary sociality, the loneliness of an aging William Faulkner, and other tribulations that flesh is heir to.
— Tom Lutz
Transactions along the Mississippi Delta

GLEN DAVID GOLD


Recently, I spoke to a group of MFA students at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. I wanted to pass along the best advice I got in my own MFA program 15 years ago. Our professor Wilton Barnhart had said, “cultivate literary friendships.”

It was almost a koan in its three-word simplicity. He meant us to sift through what that verb, that adjective and that noun might mean to us. He did not add a clause that I now wish he had: “and for Christ’s sake, do not let them become transactional.”

The world after publication is — beyond its many joys — an evaporating and ruinous goldfish bowl of thwarted ambition. If you write long enough, you will know editors and agents. You will have dinner with people who give interesting fellowships to weeklong retreats in the south of France. You will teach at good programs and you might know when a publisher’s child is having a birthday and what his favorite Transformer is, and these facts more than the quality of your humanity might be what makes you a chess piece when another writer slaps you on the back and asks you if you might read something he wrote.

It’s hard to explain to writing students that there are pods of very friendly, arguably moral authors who treat each other as if the literary life is led on a firing range. They meet you alertly, brightly drawing from natty holsters their own signs of power, rank and aid, and then requesting that you do the same. They aren’t evil, really, and the impulse behind it is so close to camaraderie it almost smells right. We all need help, and we all want to help each other, which makes the nuances of the transaction murky. Some people never see the problem at all and others treat every request like you’re asking for a toe of which they are particularly fond. In the end, parsing the aspirational nature of literary friendship is as much of a longshot as sexing the yeti.

Read More

Source: lareviewofbooks
  1. spudcity reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  2. rugan-prplunder-com reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  3. black-spring reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  4. anokarina reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  5. becauseitisntthere reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  6. flicknv reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  7. scz reblogged this from lareviewofbooks and added:
    This piece about Faulkner and the often transactional nature of literary friendships is fantastic. Plus, it’s got a...
  8. shogins reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  9. californianlike reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  10. dealfatigue reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  11. lollard reblogged this from lareviewofbooks and added:
    Read More “THE MORAL: DON’T FUCK WILLIAM FAULKNER”
  12. peterwknox reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  13. notzsazsa reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  14. myfanwycollins reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  15. portraitoftheartistasayoungman reblogged this from lareviewofbooks and added:
    "The world after publication is — beyond its many joys — an evaporating and ruinous goldfish bowl of thwarted ambition."
  16. juliebush reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  17. albionlibrary reblogged this from lareviewofbooks and added:
    This is amazing, and worth thinking about in almost any line of work.
  18. rizkydhini reblogged this from lareviewofbooks and added:
    dial?hm, wait.. a want to read it lareviewofbooks:
  19. lareviewofbooks posted this